On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 11:42 AM, Chris Bagley <chris.bag...@gmail.com> wrote: >> (include-local "some_header_lib.h") > > I'd love to hear some thoughts on this. I'm happy to get this done if > it's approved.
Makes sense. If we were starting from scratch perhaps we could have (include "<foo.h>") and (include "foo.h") instead. (include "\"foo.h\"") would be strange, right? Anyway, include-local seems like the way to go. Cheers, -- Luís Oliveira http://kerno.org/~luis/
