Hi Marcelo, thanks for the review.
2009/9/18 marcelo bagnulo braun <[email protected]>: > Hi, > > I am reviewing draft-ietf-csi-sndp-prob-01 to make the Shepherd write-up. > I think the document is in good shape, but I have a question about the > strcuture of the document. The current document has section 2.1. IPv6 > Mobile Nodes and Neighbor Discovery Proxy and then section 2.4. Proxy ND > and Mobility. I fail to see why these two are separated, since they both > describe scenarios involving MIP and SEND. Wouldn't make more sense to > combine these two and have a single section that describes the MIP related > scenarios? Finally, we have removed the section 2.4 because: - the first part of this section, as you said, is already described in the section 2.1 - the second part of this section described mobility issues and not security issues. Best regards. JMC. > > Regards, marcelo > > > > > > _______________________________________________ CGA-EXT mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cga-ext
