>>>>> "Terrence" == Terrence Brannon <metap...@gmail.com> writes:
Terrence> Randal wants to maintain prototype-based OOP for a Moose-based version Terrence> of CGI::Prototype. I'm wondering if such a Moose class could be as Terrence> simple as: Terrence> package CGI::Prototype::Moose; Terrence> use Moose; Terrence> extends 'Class::Prototyped'; Not really. The prototype stuff of Moose is where you want to start, and it has a different interface. If you just pulled in Class::Prototyped, you'd have a lot of potential conflicts, especially around anonymous classes. -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 <mer...@stonehenge.com> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/> Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See http://methodsandmessages.vox.com/ for Smalltalk and Seaside discussion ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ cgi-prototype-users mailing list cgi-prototype-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cgi-prototype-users
