Cees Hek wrote:
As an example of how it works, I have put up new versions of the
CGI::Application::Session and CGI::Application::TT modules on my website
(http://cees.crtconsulting.ca/perl/modules/), as well as a tarball
containing the actual CGI::Application::Plugin module.
Just one more comment/question here. Other modules that use a plugin
style architecture usually put them into a ::Plugin namespace (ie,
Template::Plugin::DBI). Should we consider doing that here if we are
serious about hording up a lot of plugins? Should CGI::Application::TT
become CGI::Application::Plugin::TT?
My vote is yes (not to criticize the naming of your tools Cees :). At
least for all future plugins it seems to make sense to me.
Michael Peters
Developer
Plus Three
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Web Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=cgiapp&r=1&w=2
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
