On 2004-09-09, Rhesa Rozendaal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I agree. In fact, I feel that modifying mode_param to look at the
> PATH_INFO first can be justified by the practice: I have never
> encountered a situation where my scripts had a path_info without me
> explicitly setting it, and I've been using C::A for almost two years now
> in at least 5 large applications. I don't expect it would break any
> existing applications.
I'm not suggesting that it be turned on by default. That would probably
break someone's application, somewhere. :)
I suppose there is also one more related option to consider. In my
implementation, I check PATH_INFO and fall back to 'rm' if it's missing.
It would be possible to work in the other direction-- try 'PATH_INFO' if
'rm' is missing.
I don't think either makes sense to turn on by default. I prefer trying
path_info first, simply because it's what I'm used to.
Mark
--
http://mark.stosberg.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Web Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=cgiapp&r=1&w=2
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
