As would I :) I'm not excited about maintaining a fork, but I'd rather do that than let C::S languish.
I think I am going to post to the Perl module authors mailing list and think some more about a possible fork. I'll keep the list posted. Jason -------------------------------------------------- Jason A. Crome Senior Software Engineer, DEVNET, Inc. E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.devnetinc.com > -----Original Message----- > From: William McKee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 2:14 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [cgiapp] CGI::Session maintainer help needed. > (was: Re: CGI::Application::Plugin::Session - new session every call) > > On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 01:24:28PM -0500, Jason A. Crome wrote: > > I've pondered the latter at length. What do the rest of you think? > > Personally, I'd rather see the existing modules maintained > instead of forked. I don't know what the procedures are for > getting access to modules of a non-responding author. I hope > you can make some progress with it. > > > Good luck, > William > > -- > Knowmad Services Inc. > http://www.knowmad.com > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Web Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=cgiapp&r=1&w=2 > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- Web Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=cgiapp&r=1&w=2 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
