On Tue, 2005-04-26 at 01:33, Wojciech Pietron wrote: > Yes, I like it too. The reason I do not use CGI is its unresolved bug > mentioned by Mark Stosberg on cascade-dataform list > http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=7275077 > and CGI list: > http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=83ca080.0402281631.368cd433%40posting.google.com
Sorry about the off topic post but I'm not subscribed to cascade-dataform and haven't actully used DFV yet myself. I was going over the archive messages and the following in the message: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=7292541 > At this point, I"m also suspecting it"s a CGI.pm issue. The extra > "unknown" fields indicate that it"s actually producing different output > with the same input. Although I recall making a test that just involved > CGI.pm, and I couldn"t reproduce it. I have a question about this > pending on the CGI newsgroup now as well. The extra "unknown" fields indicate to me that DFV is treating the CGI object as a hashref for some reason. Could someone that is using DFV try changing the line in _get_data() that reads: if (UNIVERSAL::isa($data,"UNIVERSAL") ) { to something like: if (ref($data) ne 'HASH') ) { Now the problem is if this fixes the problem with DFV I'm at a loss as to why it would. -- Tony Fraser [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sybaspace Internet Solutions System Administrator phone: (250) 246-5368 fax: (250) 246-5398 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Web Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=cgiapp&r=1&w=2 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
