On 12/12/05, Michael Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But maybe I'm not understanding your question. Are you asking me why I
> think these systems are different? Or are you asking me to justify why
> I want the second one?
I was just curious why you are suggesting a new module and why
CGI::Application::Dispatch couldn't be adapted to provide the features
being discussed.
> From my perspective, with my variety of real-world mapping requirements,
> allowing '/string/:app/:rm' => { prefix => 'Foo' } is a *minimalist*
> solution. Believe it or not. :)
I think you mean app and not prefix in that hash. PREFIX is an
existing option in CGI::Application::Dispatch.
Did anyone have any thoughts on moving the variable assignment into
the hash instead of tacking them onto the TABLE key? I.E.
'string' => { app=> 'Foo', params=>':app/:rm' }
Does this add clarity so that conflicting dispatch rules are created?
It did for me though I'm still not clear to how a missing required
parameter is handled. (Who handles the error? The run mode or the
dispatcher?)
<tim/>
--
Timothy Appnel
http://www.timaoutloud.org/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Web Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=cgiapp&r=1&w=2
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
