On 12/13/05, Tony Fraser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 2005-12-13 at 13:06 -0500, Rob Kinyon wrote: > > My proposal in this thread is more radical than that. I'm proposing > > that CA becomes a pipeline with a set of default implementations for > > each step along the way. That way, you can customize the CA pipeline > > to perform exactly what you want to do when you want it to happen. > > That's what Jesse et al are objecting to. > > That sounds an awful lot like the implementation of CGI::Prototype. > > http://search.cpan.org/~merlyn/CGI-Prototype-0.9053/
I wrote a review/criticism of CGI::Prototype on Perlmonks when it first came out. It's not this. It's Randal's randomness + Prototype-based objects. I'm not sure, but I think I heard mention that he doesn't use it anymore. Rob --------------------------------------------------------------------- Web Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=cgiapp&r=1&w=2 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
