On 7/6/06 2:28 PM, "Joel Gwynn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> True.  One should also consider google-ability.  Web::Application
> could be as difficult to google as .NET.

I further this sentiment.  Sticking religiously to "name is function"
satisfies one goal, but may fall short for others.  Is there a big downside
to "going out on a limb" with the name (perhaps within the Web:: namespace,
perhaps not)?

Sean


---------------------------------------------------------------------
Web Archive:  http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
              http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=cgiapp&r=1&w=2
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to