Hi Ron & All -- > > My thoughts about the name (in loose order of preference): > > WWW::ImageServer > > My preference too, but then I did not think too hard... > > > Apache::ImageServer > > Apache? Will it be crippleware, ie refuse to run on other web > servers (not that > there are that many choices)? > > > CGI::Application::ImageServer > > Understandable choice, but my policy these days is to use > names which describe > what a module does, rather than describe what components were > used to provide > the module's services.
How about: HTTP::ImageAbuser Too obscure? Too cute? As a few others pointed out, most of the "WWW::" space is clients, so "HTTP::" might be a better place. Also, this will work on non-Apache servers (although, I'd like to make it work particularly well in Apache). -Jesse- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Web Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=cgiapp&r=1&w=2 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
