"Rhesa Rozendaal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would vote not doing this in CGI::Application itself. I'd rather see > C::A and H::T completely decoupled.
This is good thing - it will make C:A more "generalized". But since they are copuled... > A more sensible place would be in CGI::Application::Plugin::AnyTemplate, > but I could also see the use for a CAP::HtmlTemplate-ish plugin. > > Something like > > use CGI::Application::Plugin::HtmlTemplateX 'HTML::Template::Compiled'; > > could export load_tmpl, using the supplied H::T derivative. OK I'll stop on this (alredy wrote). IMHO specifying module name at compile time isn't good idea - object variable is more flexible way. wbr Viacheslav Sheveliov --------------------------------------------------------------------- Web Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=cgiapp&r=1&w=2 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
