Yeah, well I started with Class::DBI... DBIx::Class allows you to
chain relationships., which I am not sure DB::Rose does.
We have a pretty elaborate schema.
But anyway... I am not switching. Maybe next project (we have long
term plans to make a very normalized schema, and layer application
views on top of it, but that is down the road a ways).
Ben
From: "Ron Savage" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
DBIx::Class: Errr, I would definitely have gone with Rose there...
Which are the advantages of Rose?
Just in case you can't find the msg I referred to in my previous post,
the very syhort answer is:
o Rose gives you a Perl-centric view of your data
o The other mechanisms are all - AFAICT - row-centric
In othr words, this means Rose effortlessly slips under Perl umbrella.
--
Ron Savage
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://savage.net.au/index.html
##### CGI::Application community mailing list ################
## ##
## To unsubscribe, or change your message delivery options, ##
## visit: http://www.erlbaum.net/mailman/listinfo/cgiapp ##
## ##
## Web archive: http://www.erlbaum.net/pipermail/cgiapp/ ##
## Wiki: http://cgiapp.erlbaum.net/ ##
## ##
################################################################
--
Ben Hitz
Senior Scientific Programmer ** Saccharomyces Genome Database ** GO
Consortium
Stanford University ** [EMAIL PROTECTED]
##### CGI::Application community mailing list ################
## ##
## To unsubscribe, or change your message delivery options, ##
## visit: http://www.erlbaum.net/mailman/listinfo/cgiapp ##
## ##
## Web archive: http://www.erlbaum.net/pipermail/cgiapp/ ##
## Wiki: http://cgiapp.erlbaum.net/ ##
## ##
################################################################
