> Now, when I saw Matt Trout, a Catalyst maintainer at YAPC, he was having
> second
> thoughts about using subroutine attributes in Catalyst, although he didn't go
> into detail. And I have run into problems with them in the past.
>
> So, I'm not recommending that style as being "preferred", but I think it's an
> option some people might enjoy having.
Here's a current conversation about the past and future of subroutine attributes
in Catalyst:
http://use.perl.org/comments.pl?sid=41074&cid=65070
It does sound questionable that using them as a core framework feature giving
the state of what's possible (and works well) with Perl now.
Mark
##### CGI::Application community mailing list ################
## ##
## To unsubscribe, or change your message delivery options, ##
## visit: http://www.erlbaum.net/mailman/listinfo/cgiapp ##
## ##
## Web archive: http://www.erlbaum.net/pipermail/cgiapp/ ##
## Wiki: http://cgiapp.erlbaum.net/ ##
## ##
################################################################
