Thanks to all for the feedback. It seems that, basically, it's between Rose::DB::Object and DBIx::Class. So far, RDO looks more like what I need, but a bit complex.
Would you like to see a new ORM in cpan, more simpler? On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 1:50 AM, George Hartzell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Benjamin Hitz writes: > > > > We have begun a conversion from an old, hand rolled "ORM" to > > DBIx::Class. There are lots of nice properties, but our DB has 120- > > odd tables, and the start up time is killing us (ca. 2sec.). > > Hopefully, we can resolve the speed issue with PersistantPerl and/or > > FCGI, but I will be investigating a switch over to Rose::DB. > > Does each request need all (or some unpredictable subset) of the > tables? Could you get away with loading them on demand (or loading a > subset in a sub-app)? > > g. > > ##### CGI::Application community mailing list ################ > ## ## > ## To unsubscribe, or change your message delivery options, ## > ## visit: http://www.erlbaum.net/mailman/listinfo/cgiapp ## > ## ## > ## Web archive: http://www.erlbaum.net/pipermail/cgiapp/ ## > ## Wiki: http://cgiapp.erlbaum.net/ ## > ## ## > ################################################################ > > ##### CGI::Application community mailing list ################ ## ## ## To unsubscribe, or change your message delivery options, ## ## visit: http://www.erlbaum.net/mailman/listinfo/cgiapp ## ## ## ## Web archive: http://www.erlbaum.net/pipermail/cgiapp/ ## ## Wiki: http://cgiapp.erlbaum.net/ ## ## ## ################################################################
