On Thu, 4 Dec 2008 23:03:45 -0500 "Mark Rajcok" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 10:42 PM, Mark Stosberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I'm looking for feedback on a small working "core" of an application and > > > tutorial that I recently wrote. The tutorial is here: > > > http://docs.google.com/View?docID=dd363fg9_77gb4hdh7b&revision=_latest > > > > I've reviewed this in some more detail. It's nice. The performance > > seemed pretty zippy to me. I assume you choose this solution over > > others because of the expectation that performs well in vanilla CGI? > > Yes. I updated the tutorial to state that in the overview. A bit more feedback. I think you can safely add more confidence to this sentence, based on my experience switching CGI::App projects between CGI and mod_perl, and a quick review of your code: "I hope that this application will also work in mod_perl and Apache::Registry environments, but I have not tested either." I think it's safe to say: "This application should also work under mod_perl and Apache::Registry with little or no changes-- many CGI::Application projects do. However, I have not yet tested this specific application in that context." Mark ##### CGI::Application community mailing list ################ ## ## ## To unsubscribe, or change your message delivery options, ## ## visit: http://www.erlbaum.net/mailman/listinfo/cgiapp ## ## ## ## Web archive: http://www.erlbaum.net/pipermail/cgiapp/ ## ## Wiki: http://cgiapp.erlbaum.net/ ## ## ## ################################################################
