Hi Folks

On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 15:52 +0000, Lyle wrote:
> [email protected] wrote:
> > I'm building a new server for use with CGI::Application and I'm deciding
> > on Apache 1.3 vs Apache 2.2. Currently I use Apache 1.3. I don't see a
> > compelling argument to go one way or the other and I think you all might
> > have more insight as it relates to CGI::Application use.
> >
> > Fellow CGI::Application users, can you tell me which one you prefer?
> >   
> 
> Use 2.2. Some Linux's don't have packages for 1.3 any more. Apache in 
> fact classes 1.3 as legacy now.

Exactly. No matter how good Apache V 1 is or was, it has effectively
been pushed into obsolesence by V 2.

And yes, people will go on using it (V 1) for years. That's a testament
to it's quality. But that's not, IMHO, a reason for new projects to
adopt it.

-- 
Ron Savage
[email protected]
http://savage.net.au/index.html



#####  CGI::Application community mailing list  ################
##                                                            ##
##  To unsubscribe, or change your message delivery options,  ##
##  visit:  http://www.erlbaum.net/mailman/listinfo/cgiapp    ##
##                                                            ##
##  Web archive:   http://www.erlbaum.net/pipermail/cgiapp/   ##
##  Wiki:          http://cgiapp.erlbaum.net/                 ##
##                                                            ##
################################################################

Reply via email to