Hi Richard On Thu, 2009-06-18 at 09:31 +0100, Richard Jones wrote: > Rhesa Rozendaal wrote: > > >> It was designed to just get OP (Original Poster) to re-think /his/ line > >> of attack :-). > > > > Good point. At the very least it prompted me to suggest yet another > > approach. > > Ar you still with us, Richard? :-) > > Wasn't then (02:52 GMT) - am now. It's true I've had a few issues with
Just in case you think I'm a night owl too, it was 11:09 am when I posted... That's what you get for being at the center of internet, aka Melbourne, Australia :-). > RunmodeDeclare in the past, but always because I've misused it. Your > suggestion not to use signatures on run modes and to fetch query params > traditionally, or alternatively only declare positional arguments, are > both consistent with maintainability IMO, provided it's documented > locally in the application, so I can remember how it works when I come > back to it in future. That's really the issue here I think - > understanding (and remembering) how RunmodeDeclare (and > Method::Signatures) actually works. > > So in answer to Ron's nuclear option, I'm not persuaded it's necessary > to bin it at the moment. But in reality I use it only for the admin > parts of my app, as it was too much work to re-factor all the rest of it > away from AutoRunmode, which was and is working fine anyway. Fair enough. I'm deeply uneasy about adding these modules on top of things, myself, so I don't. -- Ron Savage [email protected] http://savage.net.au/index.html ##### CGI::Application community mailing list ################ ## ## ## To unsubscribe, or change your message delivery options, ## ## visit: http://www.erlbaum.net/mailman/listinfo/cgiapp ## ## ## ## Web archive: http://www.erlbaum.net/pipermail/cgiapp/ ## ## Wiki: http://cgiapp.erlbaum.net/ ## ## ## ################################################################
