> but as long as it
> maintains backwards compat. (which I think it does) it sounds like a
> good step forward.
Thanks for the feedback. There are no plans to break backwards-compatibility as
part of this.
It's a relatively small change in the amount of code added.
Mark
--
http://mark.stosberg.com/
##### CGI::Application community mailing list ################
## ##
## To unsubscribe, or change your message delivery options, ##
## visit: http://www.erlbaum.net/mailman/listinfo/cgiapp ##
## ##
## Web archive: http://www.erlbaum.net/pipermail/cgiapp/ ##
## Wiki: http://cgiapp.erlbaum.net/ ##
## ##
################################################################
