On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 4:51 PM, P Kishor <[email protected]> wrote: > > So, my question is thus -- how is Dancer different from CGI::App,
This must be a matter of personal preference. I like C::A's stages of processing (init, setup, pre, postrun). Dancer's focus on http method (put, get, post, delete) seems pedantic to me. It's rare that I need a web application to perform different processing based upon the http method. I like C::A's runmode (or dispatch's paths). I wouldn't want to takeover support for a "dancer" application, deciphering regular expressions. Mark ##### CGI::Application community mailing list ################ ## ## ## To unsubscribe, or change your message delivery options, ## ## visit: http://www.erlbaum.net/mailman/listinfo/cgiapp ## ## ## ## Web archive: http://www.erlbaum.net/pipermail/cgiapp/ ## ## Wiki: http://cgiapp.erlbaum.net/ ## ## ## ################################################################
