Hi John On Wed, 2010-10-13 at 17:43 -0400, John Saylor wrote: > hola > > On Wed, 2010-10-13 at 13:16 +0100, Lyle wrote: > > Sounds like that would make a good patch then :) Any takers? > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ron Savage > > There's no point - Mark Stosberg refuses to release any more versions of > CGI::Session. > > > > > well, fork stosberg ... ;-)
He, he, he. The problems with forking /the module/ are: o Effort. Is it worth it? For users not in a position to switch to Plack, obviously yes, but for others (hint: coders like me), maybe not. I do have a lot of time available, but do I wish to patch (perhaps meaning maintain) all add-ons? It's possible, just how mad would I have to be? o Namespaces. I could easily call it Generic::Session or anything, but the code uses namespaced-add-ons to load id generators, DB interfaces, whatever. It would require a hell of a lot of patching :-)). Yes, it's a once-off, but still... o Perhaps a new start could be made, not Plack-dependent, but brand-new code for running under generic CGI situations. There's much to think about, and I've been thinking about it for more that a year, i.e. since the last /official/ release to CPAN in August, 2009. -- Ron Savage http://savage.net.au/ Ph: 0421 920 622 ##### CGI::Application community mailing list ################ ## ## ## To unsubscribe, or change your message delivery options, ## ## visit: http://www.erlbaum.net/mailman/listinfo/cgiapp ## ## ## ## Web archive: http://www.erlbaum.net/pipermail/cgiapp/ ## ## Wiki: http://cgiapp.erlbaum.net/ ## ## ## ################################################################
