On 24/05/2011 19:08, Joshua Miller wrote: > > Completely agree and second this. If you have a choice of FastCGI or > CGI, just go FastCGI. If you're concerned about the differences in > memory usage and such, you're free to benchmark them, but I can > assure you that, under any load at all, FastCGI can serve more pages > using less memory and cpu time. >
I just deployed the same app under CGI::Application::PSGI/nginx/Starman and I'm getting a weird error which is very difficult to debug. The app will run fine returning a results page from a database lookup but if hit the Back button and resubmit it will continue successfully for between 5 and 10 repetitions then fail on one of the app's error handlers for a for field having too many characters. So nginx has proxied successfully and Starman returns 200 but it's failing unpredictably. I don't know if this has anything to do with it but I used a proxy_pass nginx setting rather than a fastcgi_pass setting. gvim ##### CGI::Application community mailing list ################ ## ## ## To unsubscribe, or change your message delivery options, ## ## visit: http://www.erlbaum.net/mailman/listinfo/cgiapp ## ## ## ## Web archive: http://www.erlbaum.net/pipermail/cgiapp/ ## ## Wiki: http://cgiapp.erlbaum.net/ ## ## ## ################################################################
