Hi Tim On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 11:13 -0400, Timothy Appnel wrote: > I was looking to figure out which exception package to use in a project[1] > and thought I would consult CA dispatch to see what was being used. Why does > CAD directly require two different exceptions packages? I understand that > sometimes a dependency requires a package that is redundant to another or the > one you selected, but that is not the case here. > > http://deps.cpantesters.org/?module=CGI%3A%3AApplication%3A%3ADispatch;perl=latest > > See lines 4 and 51 in this report currently. > > Could anyone shed some light on this situation?
I had a look at the source code for CAD, and it would be trivial to patch to replace Exception::Class::TryCatch with Try::Tiny. I suggest you just log a report with RT (or whatever the author prefers) asking for this. If I wasn't so lazy (today) I'd submit a patch myself. You could. > Thanks. > > <tim/> > > [1] This is a major gripe of mine with the state of Perl. It's utterly > ridiculous that something like this isn't standardized, but I digress. I agree. It's a long story, and I can almost resist the urge to say something ... > Sent from my iPhone No need to apologize - no-one's perfect - hahahahahahaha. -- Ron Savage http://savage.net.au/ Ph: 0421 920 622 ##### CGI::Application community mailing list ################ ## ## ## To unsubscribe, or change your message delivery options, ## ## visit: http://www.erlbaum.net/mailman/listinfo/cgiapp ## ## ## ## Web archive: http://www.erlbaum.net/pipermail/cgiapp/ ## ## Wiki: http://cgiapp.erlbaum.net/ ## ## ## ################################################################
