[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> On Fri, 18 Jan 2002 00:57, you wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > I use HTML::FillInForm as well, but have found that you need to be
> > > careful with your run-modes when using HTML::FillInForm.  Even if you
> > > statically add your runmodes to your templates, HTML::FillInForm will
> > > 'rewrite' your hidden fields, including the runmode if the runmode was
> > > part of the CGI query object.  This is only really a problem if you
> have
> > > multiple forms on your page that submit to different runmodes.
> >
> > This issue was addressed in one of the more recent releases of
> > HTML::FillInForm. From the docs:
> >
> >            Suppose you have multiple forms in a html and among
> >            them there is only one form you want to fill in,
> >            specify target.
> 
> Yes, I noticed that, but since I always statically include my runmodes in
> the templates, I don't ever want HTML::FillInForm to change a runmode
> variable. 

Hello Cees,

If you define the run mode statically in the template, then 
HTML::FillinForm should always re-fill it with the same static value. 
Besides the multi-form issue addressed by HFiF's "target" attribute, I
can't think of another case where HFiF could do the wrong thing with a
static run mode. 

  -mark 

 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
   Mark Stosberg              Principal Developer  
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]       Summersault, LLC     
   765-939-9301 ext 223       website development  
 . . . . . http://www.summersault.com/ . . . . . . .

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to