On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 3:37 PM, John Keeping <[email protected]> wrote: > Care to be more specific? I think this behaviour is the same as the > code it replaces.
You're right -- I sent the follow-up email to say "whoops, that's not the code that's bad. It's this code instead, below." _______________________________________________ cgit mailing list [email protected] http://hjemli.net/mailman/listinfo/cgit
