On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 11:20 PM, John Keeping <j...@keeping.me.uk> wrote: > At once (as in in parallel), or without needing to fork for every > request? I think that many requests serially in the same process is a > much more likely scenario (that's what FastCGI does); in that case all > we need to do is clean up after each request and it doesn't make much > difference if that state is global or passed down through the functions > that need it.
Yea, that's a good point I suppose. Parallel request capability would still be nice, in some abstract sense, but I guess it's not clear what the benefits would be practically. I'll merge Lukas' patch, and we'll refactor later if necessary. _______________________________________________ CGit mailing list CGit@lists.zx2c4.com http://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/cgit
