On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 10:32 PM, Jamie Couture <[email protected]> wrote: > Hmm. It looks like struct stat lock_st member, introduced in > 939d32fd, was never used anywhere in cgit. Would it make sense to > separate this line in a differnt commit, explaining the unused > member should be removed?
I noticed this too. In the future, it's nice to break these up. For now, not such a huge deal. _______________________________________________ CGit mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/cgit
