On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 02:11:51PM +0100, Stefan Naewe wrote: > On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 10:29 PM, John Keeping <j...@keeping.me.uk> wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 05:39:53PM +0100, Stefan Naewe wrote: > >> When the git function format_display_notes() is called > >> with a value != 0 as the last argument ('raw') the notes text > >> gets displayed w/o an additional 'Notes:' header. This seems > >> to be better suited for our needs since we're already displaying > >> a similar header. > > > > What happens when there are multiple display notes refs? It seems that > > without "raw", format_note() puts the name of the ref in the header it > > prints (if it's not the default notes ref). > That's true for 'git show --notes=...' for example. > > But how would you specify the name of the notes ref in cgit ?
git config --add notes.displayRef ... > > It's possible that the correct answer is that we don't care about that > > case, but it is potentially a regression for people who want to display > > multiple notes. > > Attached are two screenshots of commit notes added with 'git notes > add..' for the first line and > 'git notes append...' for the second line. That particular commit also > has another note > attached in the 'refs/notes/todo' namespace. > > My opinion about this topic: I really like the way cgit displays the > commit notes but not the > double "Notes" header line. _______________________________________________ CGit mailing list CGit@lists.zx2c4.com http://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/cgit