Hi, John Keeping wrote: > On Sat, Jun 16, 2018 at 12:32:06PM -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote: >> We might also want to drop 'doc-pdf' from the default 'doc' >> target. The alternative is driving the asciidoc pipeline >> for the pdf generation too. That looks a little more >> involved than doing it for html, but perhaps it's not as bad >> as I think. > > I think we can definitely drop doc-pdf from the default output. > > I'm half tempted to say we should just delete the PDF output completely > and see if anyone complains, unless you know of anyone using this?
We don't generate the pdf docs for the Fedora/EPEL cgit builds and no one has yet filed a bug asking for it. Poking around, none of Arch, Debian, Gentoo, and Ubuntu build the pdf docs (in fact, they don't include the html target either). Maybe that's a good sign that the pdf target wouldn't be missed by many people. > Otherwise, the dependency on $(DOC_MAN5) seems reasonable > to me, probably accompanied with a comment explaining the > clash in a2x's intermediate files. Cool. I'll wait a bit and see if anyone chimes in with support for keeping the pdf target. If not, dropping it is the easier option. Thanks, -- Todd ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ I dropped acid on a Saturday night Just to see what the fuss was about. Now there goes the neighborhood. _______________________________________________ CGit mailing list CGit@lists.zx2c4.com https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/cgit