On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 2:44 AM Andy Green <[email protected]> wrote: > > looked at in depth. (See the list archives.) Our last conclusion from > > examining it was that so much of libgit is not re-entrant, and so we'd > > need to move to something like libgit2 for this to be feasible. Too > > many globals, etc. > > Let me guess, not enough people around working on this project, for some > reason, to move to libgit2.
No, actually. The reason is that we'd like to stay close to what git.git is doing. > If that's your feeling about the whole stack of clientside stuff, I > understand you don't want to cooperate on it. I think you misinterpreted me. I think the clientside work you're doing is interesting and worth considering. I was speaking to somebody earlier today who is actually working on a JSON API for cgit, so that _all_ rendering can be done clientside. What I'm specifically rejecting in my comment here is adding gravatar support, some web service, in C directly to the core of cgit, when the lua support has no demonstrable problems. _______________________________________________ CGit mailing list [email protected] https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/cgit
