Hi Grant,

I only have a suggestion for question # 1...

Grant Baillie wrote:
So, as I plough on through stamping-as-annotations, I found some issues that are more related to using annotations than stamping per se. They're both cases where the annotation class has attributes that aren't repository values. I'd be interested in hearing if my strategies for solving these in the schema itself are reasonably, or if there's a better way of approaching things.

1) The osaf.pim.Calculated class (essentially, the analog of a python property) doesn't play quite so nicely inside Annotations. You can go ahead and do

class MyAnnotation(schema.Annotation):

    schema.kindInfo(annotates=pim.ContentItem)

    myProp = pim.Calculated(schema.Text, ....)

and then code such as:

    MyAnnotation(someItem).myProp = ... something or other ...

works just fine. The problem is that things like attribute editors (and indexes) want to talk to items -- not Annotation/Stamp instances -- directly by attribute name. So, they require an item and an attribute name in order to edit or index something, but the property doesn't appear in the target class (ContentItem above). Is there a reasonable way to make this work? For instance, you could add a suitably wrapped property on the fly to the ContentItem class, but then you would have to be sure that this happened each time Chandler ran (i.e. it should happen at class object instantiation time, not parcel initialization time).
When I wrote Calculated, I talked with pje and we agreed that it didn't need to be moved into the schema world until there was a reason to -- is this a reason? (that is, the schema stuff could mangle the name of the Calculated property's descriptor (do they have descriptors?) at definition time, the way it does with 'real' schema attributes now ... though I'm not sure whether something needs to happen with the fset/fget method names too... pje?)

...Bryan
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev

Reply via email to