Yes,
A reply should only be a message.
However a forward, should probably inherit the stamps of the original
item being forwarded.
Mimi
On Sep 20, 2006, at 4:47 PM, Brian Kirsch wrote:
Jeffrey Harris wrote:
Hi Brian,
Brian Kirsch wrote:
Mimi's mock-ups never addressed the stamping cases. So would be
good to
get her feedback.
For now I can just copy the mailness of an item and ignore event,
task
info. However, I am not sure this is the desired behavior.
My memory of my discussions with Mimi about reply vs. edit-and-
update is
that a reply is an entirely new item, so it doesn't get any of the
original items stamps, whereas an update is a change to the
original event.
Ok cool,
If this is true then the only stamping case that still needs to be
resolved is 'Forward'.
-Brian
Sincerely,
Jeffrey
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev
--
Brian Kirsch Internationalization Architect / Mail Service Engineer
Open Source Applications Foundation
543 Howard Street 5th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105
http://www.osafoundation.org
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev
