Hi Davor,
The snapshot was designed to capture information for diagnosis of
problems; preserving a directory structure wasn't a goal, and unless it
gets more complicated stuff thrown into it, I probably won't worry about
giving it internal structure (at least until we've used a few archives
to diagnose problems!).
...Bryan
Davor Cubranic wrote:
I have a ChandlerSnapshot.tgz file that was created after Chandler
crashed and I was given an option to create a snapshot. When I peeked
at it, I noticed that it has no directory path info, even though some
files look like they're from the "repository" subdirectory and others
from the top level of Chandler's directory in "Application Data". Just
out of curiousity, why give up the directory structure in the archive?
Wouldn't it be easier for those working with the snapshot to have to
manually move the files around after the archive unpacks itself?
Davor
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev
