At 05:04 PM 1/26/2007 -0800, Grant Baillie wrote:
Hmmm... I'm not sure that's the simplest solution, though: essentially this adds a new stamping feature.
Well, at least it's only two lines of code, or one if you cram the "return True" on the "def" line. :)
I agree the EventStamp.isAttributeModifiable() implementation is useless as it stands. But, do any stamps need to override what's on ContentItem?
The new SharedItem stamp does. That was actually the point of Morgen's original question, so we could remove osaf.pim's dependency on osaf.sharing (and along with it, some of the last uses of 'otherName' and other cycle-breaking tricks).
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev
