At 02:01 PM 1/30/2007 -0800, Morgen Sagen wrote:
On Jan 30, 2007, at 1:21 PM, Phillip J. Eby wrote:
At 12:37 PM 1/30/2007 -0800, Morgen Sagen wrote:
Additionally, If the item version
embedded in the EIMML is less than or equal to the version number
last seen from this peer, an OutOfSequence exception is raised.
Just an FYI, but this isn't really an error condition. If we
receive an out-of-sequence email, we should simply ignore it.
I thought about just ignoring it, but then I thought perhaps the
caller might want to be aware of this situation, and possibly alert
the user(?). Not sure.
I think it's clear the user doesn't need to know, as there is no choice to
make and no action to take. And I really hate programs that tell you stuff
like, "Hey, just so you know, somebody fromulated the thingamajig! No
action is required.", and then I'm all like, "um, okay then." ;-)
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev
