D John Anderson wrote: > Actually it's a little more complicated than this. > > There are 3 situations: > > 1) we need to copy a new tree of blocks and need to attach new contents > 2) we can reuse a cached copy but need to attach new contents > 3) we can reuse a copy and don't need to attach new contents
Does that also cover the case where we have everything loaded into memory vs. things coming from disk? I.e. cases where you have had Chandler running for a while and have switched already between collections, and the case where you shut that Chandler instance and restart it with the same repository? It is starting to look like we can't reasonably measure all cases. So do we continue the status quo or measure something else? And if something else, what is that? -- Heikki Toivonen
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev
