On 15 Mar, 2007, at 09:10, Morgen Sagen wrote:
On Mar 13, 2007, at 10:59 AM, Grant Baillie wrote:
...
- NoteRecord currently has:
# Note.reminders? (Translator not implemented yet)
reminderTime = eim.field(eim.DecimalType(digits=20,
decimal_places=0))
[√] My understanding here is that Bug 7915 (and iCalendar
interoperability)
imply that we should have a separate ReminderRecord (or,
AlarmRecord, if
we're going with iCalendar-like syntax). What do people think
of that?
Is that what the DisplayAlarmRecord is for?
Yes, it is. I had somehow missed that that was there (probably b/c I
did the wrong word search, I'd guess).
Actually I don't remember the relationship between
Note.reminderTime field and DisplayAlarmRecord.
Here's what you wrote in
<http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/cosmo-dev/2007-January/
002560.html>
We decided to add a reminderTime field to NoteRecord to represent an
absolute reminder time for non-event items. Once a note with a
reminder is stamped as an event, the NoteRecord.reminderTime field
will be set to nil, and a DisplayAlarmRecord instance will be emitted.
It seems to me we should go with the ICalendar-like scheme here: have
a DisplayAlarmRecord for any ItemRecord with alarms (user reminders,
in Chandler terminology). It should be an error to set a "relative"
alarm (i.e. one with a trigger value like "-PT15M") on something that
doesn't have an EventRecord.
Cosmo folks, is that your expectation?
--Grant
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev
