On Mon, 2 Apr 2007, Heikki Toivonen wrote:
Some reasons I have for preferring ./tools/rt.py to run system python: * tools should not depend on Chandler unless they have to * In case Chandler is so borked that python won't run properly I want rt still to function (tbox will rely on this) - think about case where chandler python hangs on startup * I want rt.py to run fast, using python release bits - which would not work if you did make install DEBUG=1 * I don't think you can put Chandler python on the bang line in $CHANDLERBIN/(debug|release)/RunChandler(.bat) format
We should have only one way of running rt.pt and that is: rp rt.py Requiring a second python is frivolous, especially on Windows. Andi.. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev
