Hi Aparna, I migrated with this continuous build of Chandler (after initially running into the same problem I think that Priscilla did with the initially recommended checkpoint build):
Chandler_win_debug_0.7.dev-r14328-20070516104911.exe Thanks, Andre On Wed, 16 May 2007 15:51:56 -0700, "Aparna Kadakia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Hi Andre, > Thank you for taking the leap here on migrating your data to Chandler > Hub. > Your feedback is greatly appreciated. > > See my comments inline: > > On May 16, 2007, at 3:26 PM, Andre Mueninghoff wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > I've migrated successfully to Chander Hub. It was a relatively > > seamless > > process. The only very minor issues I would raise are 1) Chandler > > (debug > > build r14228 on WinXP) is not (hasn't for awhile) displaying the > > sharing > > type icon next to the collection name unless one selects a collection > > and then the sharing icon for only that collection is displayed (if > > there is one to display). This just means that I have to highlight > > collection names one by one to verify the unsubscribe from osaf.us and > > the publish to hub.chandlerproject.org. > Yes, it's a blocker bug currently. > https://bugzilla.osafoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8791 > > > Might be good to mention this in > > the migration instructions. > Good point. If the bug is not resolved by the time we are ready to > migrate the dogfooders we will document it clearly in the migration > instructions. Thank you for pointing that out. > > > 2) The same Chandler is not (hasn't for > > awhile) displaying the build number in the About dialogue. Might > > interfere with verification of the Chandler one is using. Maybe these > > are debug build issues only. > > There is already an open bug about the version number not displaying > in the continous builds. > https://bugzilla.osafoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8747 > > Andre, can you tell me whether you are using a checkpoint build or a > continuous build? > Or if you post the contents of your version.py that will tell us for > sure. > > > Congrats on releasing Cosmo 0.6.1 and > > EIMML. I think it would fair to characterize the difference between > > the > > previous DAV sync speed and the new EIMML sync speed as the difference > > between impulse power and warp power. :-) > > Best regards, Andre > > > > > > On Tue, 15 May 2007 22:35:59 -0700, "Aparna Kadakia" > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > >> Hello everyone, > >> This is a reminder about tomorrow's IRC QA session at 11:00 AM PDT in > >> #cosmo channel. > >> We will be focussing on getting the internal dogfooders to migrate > >> their data from osaf.us to Chandler Hub which is now on our newly > >> released Cosmo 0.6.1 release. > >> > >> Here are the instructions for the end-users migrating their data from > >> [osaf.us+DAV] sharing to [hub.chandlerproject.org+EIM] sharing. > >> http://wiki.osafoundation.org/Projects/DavToEimMigrationUserDoc > >> > >> Part of the objective of the test session is to also validate the > >> steps identified in the document. The document supports both a4 and > >> trunk users looking to migrate their data to the new server. > >> > >> The Chandler Checkpoint build that is recommended in the migration > >> instructions is r14323 and can be downloaded at: > >> http://downloads.osafoundation.org/chandler/snapshots/20070515/ > >> > >> Again, we will be conducting this session in the #cosmo channel at > >> 11:00 AM PDT. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Aparna > >> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ > >> > >> Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list > >> http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev > _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev
