I see something odd on the continuous build page: there are a couple of snapshots that have yesterday's timestamp (20070522), but the svn release number within them is always r14381. Or am I misinterpreting the naming scheme for builds? Grant's fix for bug 9252 is r16757, so r14381 is not going to help me with my migration problem.

Davor


On Tue, 22 May 2007, Aparna Kadakia wrote:


On May 22, 2007, at 2:09 PM, Jared Rhine wrote:


2) One user, Davor, who has been a steady alpha 4 user, filed a new bug 9252 during migration testing today, where his osaf.us shares would not restore into 20070518.

What I guess is going on is there are event syntax/semantics issues between alpha 4 and trunk. Essentially everyone at OSAF, through long use, has had their osaf.us data updated to a form compatible with trunk.

A user like Davor who hasn't upgraded ever since alpha 4, has their osaf.us data in a format that trunk can't read.


Bug 9252 (https://bugzilla.osafoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9252) has been fixed by Grant. If Davor uses the latest trunk build he will be able to restore his shares successfully from osaf.us

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev

Reply via email to