On 9/20/07, Jeffrey Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have no objection to the UI view scheduling syncs, but I guess I'd > still prefer to have edit sessions and just not sync an item while it > has an active edit session (pretend it has a conflict, basically).
Technically an item with a conflict still gets synced, but only the fields of the item that aren't in conflict. I don't think you were actually suggesting we set up a fake conflict on the item in order to keep it from being synced, but just so people understand how conflicts affect syncing I thought I would mention this. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev
