Aparna Kadakia wrote:
Apart from the larger goals of sustainable code base etc, this is specially important for making shorter release cycles successful without the unattainable effort of manually going thru 13 test specs and some 1200+ testcases for each release cycle.

This is where things sort of break apart: if I understand PJE's proposal correctly, this is one that won't land before some time (6 months? more?) which means that we'll have to leave through the pain of manually testing for a while. So we can't count on this rearchitecture to ease the short or even mid term QA pain.

Now, it's better late than never for sure. It also doesn't prevent us to use John's script recording (despite its limitation) to ease the pain in the meantime.

Cheers,
- Philippe
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev

Reply via email to