On 9 Oct, 2007, at 16:12, Andi Vajda wrote:
4. implementing a generic database inside another generic database
That was the goal, originally. Not to have a hard compiled app
against a hard compiled relational schema. If Chandler is to become
a hard compiled application with a static schema, where all data
types have to be determined in advance, then of course, the
chandler repository is overkill and can be replaced by some
specifically optimized, domain-specific, schema.
I'm confused: How is what we have (where you have to throw out your
data any time the schema at either of 2 levels changes) different
from the "hard compiled app against a hard compiled relational
schema"? (Apart from the word "relational").
--Grant
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev
