Yup, keeping both sounds good.
On Sep 15, 2008, at 2:42 PM, Sheila Mooney wrote:
So what do we use now other than #chandler, #cosmo and #osaf-staff?
I guess we could officially get rid of the internal staff channel
although we haven't been using it at all really. Does everybody
still think we should keep both #chandler and #cosmo?
On Sep 12, 2008, at 3:56 PM, Grant Baillie wrote:
Having more than one channel per staff member might indicate
hubris to some people :D. I'd be up for way fewer channels, though
maybe we should keep #cosmo around.
--Grant
On 12 Sep, 2008, at 15:14, Sheila Mooney wrote:
So, I was wondering how people felt about still keeping all the
IRC channels we have? Most of the traffic has been on the
Chandler channel, even some server related stuff and most interop
discussions. We also still have the OSAF-staff internal channel
that is rarely used. I was going to throw out the suggestions of
moving to a single Chandler channel for all discussions.
What do people think?
Cheers,
Sheila
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev
