> Oh, you know, I think I missed your initial pitch for using the > existing > commits list. That would be fine with me, except that I'd really like > the subject of the email mention what SVN repository is being reported > on.
Ah, good idea, particularly if we're using the same list for two repos. Should we have all commit messages state the repo explicitly (skipping the mailing list prefix) or just have both for everything or have only the commits list distinguish if it's getting reused? Looking for a thumbs-up/thumbs-down from a third person on using the existing commits list for the chandler2 repo. I'm willing to create a separate list too if people really think they should be separate. -- Jared _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev
