<http://chandlerproject.org/Projects/GetStarted#Quick%20entry%20field:%20experimental>
* describes prepends as 'experimental' (reflecting recent chat) * explains the deprecation of 'task' * observes the debatably bizarre effect of combining /t with /e. For a less busy future, four questions: 1) If /t (the prepend) is deprecated, then will there be an outcry from users/developers? 2) If 'task' (the concept) is added (presumably as something different from a note) (presumably following re-architecture for 2.0), then should task be OOTB, or an optional extension? IMHO (quoting from the updated wiki) note + triage + views + collections + alarm/reminder + calendar/events + addressing/messaging/sending/updating should suffice. 3) How do people feel about the word 'alarm' in lieu of 'reminder'? The alarm icon resembles an alarm bell on an alarm clock. 4) Might we have two synonymous prepends /a and /r ? To suit the two names for the single concept. Best, Graham -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/Quick-entry-field--t-misbehaviour%3A-review-of-task-%28the-concept%29-and-prepends-tp2191237p2191237.html Sent from the chandler-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev
