That part of the Lucene store extensions needs to be reworked.
The changes should be minimal, look at the svn history of PyLucene's
test_PythonDirectory.py.

That seems to have been just the ticket I needed. Based on the various changes 
visible in svn, I made a patch for chandlerdb/persistence/LuceneContainer.py 
which is attached (I hope that's ok on this list, if not let me know, and I'll 
post it some other way) It seems to work for me, all the tests apparently pass, 
but please do a sanity check on what I changed.

But, to do this properly, one needs to take on the task of upgrading
PyLucene in the chandler build.

Given, at least, that no new functionality is introduced by this
upgrade that chandler lacks or desires, I don't think you'll get much
interest in it.

ok. Well we'll see what happens with this patch then. Thanks for looking it 
over.

Thank you,
Jacob Floyd

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Attachment: LuceneContainer.py.diff
Description: Binary data

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev

Reply via email to