Grant Baillie wrote:
> 
> I'm wondering if some of the code that version of openssl uses to build
> itself is not 64-bit safe.
> 

I wondered the same thing. Saw the 
0.9.8d at
<http://svn.osafoundation.org/chandler/trunk/external/openssl/Makefile> and 
0.9.8k (latest) at <http://www.openssl.org/source/>. 

Today, experimenting with two versions 0.9.7m and 0.9.8k via MacPorts,† I
found that the earlier version was fine but that the latest version 0.9.8k
required a clean before it would build. Notes at
<http://pastebin.ca/1550494>. Does that offer any clue?

Do we need a version later than 0.9.8d for Chandler 1.x to build?

I wonder...

† <http://trac.macports.org/browser/trunk/dports/devel/openssl97/Portfile>
  <http://trac.macports.org/browser/trunk/dports/devel/openssl/Portfile>
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://n2.nabble.com/Chandler-1-Mac-OS-X-10-6-X86-64-make-DEBUG-1-world-openssl-crashes-make-failures-tp3540621p3561758.html
Sent from the chandler-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev

Reply via email to