Re: Portal capture

Mon, 03 Apr 2006 11:57:38 -0700

I've read some horror stories about bad NoCatAuth/Splash installs trapping a user at every network hop.

Using a multi-tier approach with location specific SSIDs and using a mesh'd backhaul network looks like the way to go.

On 4/3/06, Eater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Yeah, I'm sure they would.  Heh :)

Anyway, this actually sounds pretty perfectly suited to CFn.  Much
more so than nocat was.

On 4/3/06, bandwith <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> The layout that it desribes is having a central authentication server. It
> might be something to load up onto Gibson.cfn and try it out.
>
> If you're volunteering to add more DB compatibility to the wifidog project,
> I'm sure they'd love you.
>
>
> On 4/3/06, Eater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
>
> Interesting.  Looks much easier to implement than nocat, honestly.  I
> think it's a little cumbersome to insist on authenticating against
> postgres, however.  I like postgres, but it'd be nice to have the
> option to use a simple bdb or something for small deployments.
>
> On 4/3/06, bandwith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > http://dev.wifidog.org
> >
> > The feature set looks promising.
>  >
> >  >
> >
>
>
> --
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>  >
>
>


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CHAOS706.ORG" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/chaos706
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to