-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Correction, it does mention the opinion of the coffee shop owner...
> "He could have just come in the cafe, even if he didn't have any
> money, I would let him get on it," May said. May said that the
> wireless connection is free for customers to her cafe.
So what I would actually like to know at this point is how there is
prosecution for a crime when the supposed plaintiff (in this case the
wireless owner) is ex tant but not desiring to press charges? It's not
like this is a murder case where the state has a need to file charges on
its own. Besides, that right there is an expression of permission, even
if it is ex post facto.
Like I said, the _only_ reason this is happening, is because the cops
got called out on a stalker. They got all amped up hoping for a good
bust, and just found some damn guy on his laptop. But god forbid a cop
set foot on the street without busting someone for something. Gestapo, man.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFGYBRCBH0Na9yoL0ARAny+AKDES19XH3sb+cFn1DOMOlZWRVkI/ACdFyA9
kBTlblGnok6I/VyWSJiywK0=
=+MNt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"CHAOS706.ORG" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/chaos706?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
